Skip to main content

Warriors' two-timeline approach should be a cautionary tale for the Blazers

There are concerning roster parallels between Golden State and Portland
Mar 19, 2026; Buffalo, NY, USA; Michigan Wolverines forward Yaxel Lendeborg (23) reacts against the Howard Bison during the second half of a first round game of the men's 2026 NCAA Tournament at Keybank Center. Mandatory Credit: Mark Konezny-Imagn Images
Mar 19, 2026; Buffalo, NY, USA; Michigan Wolverines forward Yaxel Lendeborg (23) reacts against the Howard Bison during the second half of a first round game of the men's 2026 NCAA Tournament at Keybank Center. Mandatory Credit: Mark Konezny-Imagn Images | Mark Konezny-Imagn Images

Heading into the 2026 NBA Draft, the Golden State Warriors were considered to be a win-now team in need of win-now players. That's why it should come as no surprise that their No. 11 overall selection was Michigan forward and NCAA national champion Yaxel Lendeborg, the most NBA-ready prospect in the class at 23 years old.

Warriors still aren't ready to contend

It was a predictable selection considering the closing windows of Stephen Curry (38), Draymond Green (36), and Jimmy Butler (36), but that doesn't necessarily mean it was the correct one. Golden State still isn't built to be a contender in a Western Conference that should only be stronger next season.

A myopic lottery pick spent on someone with a relatively limited ceiling at 23 years old isn't going to be the needle mover to give Curry another chance at a ring. Had Golden State embraced this veteran timeline earlier in their roster construction, perhaps it would be a different story. But there were countless times when the Warriors attempted to balance both timelines, whether it was the selection of James Wiseman, Brandin Podziemski, or Moses Moody.

The one benefit of spending a lottery pick on such an old and experienced player is that Golden State gets an immediate contributor still on his rookie-scale deal. Still, this is a team that has had one foot in and one foot out when it comes to their young core, raising serious questions about a post-Curry era.

Blazers need to pick a timeline this summer

This dilemma serves as a cautionary tale for the Portland Trail Blazers in particular. With Damian Lillard's return just two seasons later after being traded, Portland finds itself in a similar two-timeline predicament.

They are rumored to go star hunting this offseason under aggressive new owner Tom Dundon, and could have more incentive to do so to give Lillard that first shot at a ring he deserves. But the Blazers also need to consider whether these star trade targets will raise their ceiling enough to be considered legitimate contenders in the Western Conference.

Giannis Antetokounmpo is already off the table, and these secondary stars aren't necessarily going to be the needle movers to get them past the San Antonio Spurs and Oklahoma City Thunder in the postseason.

It's important to establish a winning culture, and Portland's youth certainly gained valuable playoff experience this season. But that doesn't mean they need to revolve their offseason decisions around that veteran timeline as aggressively as the Warriors have. Portland needs to continue playing the long game, waiting to make that win-now move when its young core reaches its collective prime and is genuinely ready to contend.

Add us as a preferred source on Google

Loading recommendations... Please wait while we load personalized content recommendations