<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Rip City Project &#187; blown leads</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ripcityproject.com/tag/blown-leads/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ripcityproject.com</link>
	<description>A Portland Trailblazers Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 17:45:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Blazers 88, Kings 81 Re-Thoughts: Blowing a Lead</title>
		<link>http://ripcityproject.com/2010/03/10/blazers-88-kings-81-re-thoughts-blowing-a-lead/</link>
		<comments>http://ripcityproject.com/2010/03/10/blazers-88-kings-81-re-thoughts-blowing-a-lead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 08:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Coup</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blazers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[andre miller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blown leads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brandon Roy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jerryd bayless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LaMarcus Aldridge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martell Webster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[portland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rudy Fernandez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sacramento]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tyreke evans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ripcityproject.com/?p=3187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re going to do things a little differently tonight. Since the Blazers won a relatively simplistic game &#8212; neither team could defend the paint all that well &#8212; in which they followed a familiar pattern in failing to hold a double-digit lead in the fourth, we&#8217;re going to delve into how that happened rather than [...]</p><p><a href="http://ripcityproject.com/2010/03/10/blazers-88-kings-81-re-thoughts-blowing-a-lead/">Blazers 88, Kings 81 Re-Thoughts: Blowing a Lead</a> - <a href="http://ripcityproject.com">Rip City Project</a> - <a href="http://ripcityproject.com">Rip City Project - A Portland Trailblazers Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and More</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 244px"><a href="http://www.yardbarker.com/media/gallery?iid=7828981&amp;term=rudy+fernandez" target="_blank"><img style="border: 0pt none;" src="http://cdn.picapp.com/ftp/Images/5/4/d/7/PORTLAND_TRAIL_BLAZERS_99ae.jpg?WLSource=yardbarker.com&amp;adImageId=11169959&amp;imageId=7828981" border="0" alt="PORTLAND TRAIL BLAZERS VS LOS ANGELES LAKERS" width="234" height="351" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">I calculated the correct trajectory of each floater and everything. (Source: Yardbarker.com)</p></div>
<p><script src="http://cdn.pis.picapp.com/IamProd/PicAppPIS/JavaScript/PisV4.js" type="text/javascript"></script>We&#8217;re going to do things a little differently tonight. Since the Blazers won a relatively simplistic game &#8212; neither team could defend the paint all that well &#8212; in which they followed a familiar pattern in failing to hold a double-digit lead in the fourth, we&#8217;re going to delve into how that happened rather than go further into the broader happenings of a contest that played out rather predictably (relatively speaking). After all, we keep telling you that this Portland roster survives on it&#8217;s offense and merely gets by with its defense, so why don&#8217;t we show you for once. Show, Don&#8217;t Tell, the professors like to say.</p>
<p>The Blazers began the fourth quarter up 73-62. Just under four minutes later, after scoring their first point of the quarter, they were tied, 74-74. This is how it happened, spanning from the start of the period to the 8:11 mark, beginning with a lineup of Bayless, Rudy, Webster, Juwan and Aldridge:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Offensive Possession One</strong>: Bayless swings the ball to Juwan at the top of the key, who gives the ball to Rudy on the left wing. Juwan sets a moving screen that, despite not making much contact, helps free Rudy to drive the middle with a burst of speed. Rudy then attempts a floater over Jason Thompson, hitting back iron. <strong>73-62, 11:45</strong>.</li>
<li><span style="color: #d60000;"><strong><span style="color: #f40000;">Defensive Possession On</span>e</strong></span>: Garcia, with Rudy defending, brings the ball up and passes to Tyreke Evans coming off a down screen, right wing. As Evans waits for a pick, Garcia retreats to the left wing, Rudy stays right side to watch Evans. Evans gets the pick and moves forward with one dribble. LaMarcus Aldridge steps in to cut off Evans, but Rudy is still there, swiping at the ball and watching the pass sail over his head to Garcia, who hits an open three. Martell Webster was in the area to rotate onto Garcia, but had to watch his own man cutting back door. No rotation should have been necessary. <strong>73-65, 11:28</strong>.</li>
<li><span style="color: #000000;"><strong>Offensive Possession Two</strong></span>: Bayless comes down left side, giving Rudy the ball top key as he splits a screen in the paint to free himself. Aldridge is there to set a pick, but Rudy seemingly calls him off, directing the offense with a pointed finger. Defending is Sean May, so Rudy goes isolation on the right wing. He dribbles between his legs twice and gets by May going baseline. Both Kings forward come over to defend, but Rudy flips up another floater that hits glass and spins off the rim. <strong>73-65, 10:59</strong>.</li>
<li><span style="color: #f40000;"><strong>Defensive Possession Two</strong></span>: Evans brings the ball up with Bayless defending. Evans waits for a May pick and gets Bayless caught briefly. Bayless goes over the top of the pick but Juwan, who was on May, was behind the play ready to help. Evans passes to May, May makes a jumper with Juwan closing out. <strong>73-67, 10:45</strong>.</li>
<li><strong>Offensive Possession Three</strong>: Bayless to Rudy right wing. Rudy gives to Juwan top of the key. Bayless uses a baseline-cutting Webster to get open left wing and receives the ball from Juwan. Bayless enters the ball into Aldridge, 17-feet away. Aldridge tries to take Thompson to the middle, but Thompson draws the contact, falls back, and Aldridge is whistled for an offensive foul. <strong>73-67, 10:23</strong>.</li>
<li><span style="color: #f40000;"><strong>Defensive Possession Three</strong></span>: Evans brings the ball up on Bayless, crosses over and drives middle. Bayless stays on his right hip while Aldridge steps up to meet Evans in the paint. Evans jumps and hits Aldridge&#8217;s man, May, who was five feet away being help defended by Webster. May catches and takes one dribble to back up to the free-throw line. Webster releases and four Blazer defenders within eight feet watch as May makes the uncontested jumper. Mike Barret implies that May should have been called for three-in-the-key. May, having deftly stepped out of the key as the play developed, was in the key for 1.9 seconds. <strong>73-69, 9:56</strong>.</li>
<li><strong>Offensive Possession Four</strong>: Bayless brings it up, Aldridge sets a screen and Bayless winds up with Thompson defending right wing. Bayless crosses over right, beats Thompson inside and misses a layup with Thompson recovering. <strong>Offensive Possession Five</strong>: Aldridge grabs the rebound and passes out of a cluster of defenders to extra-super open Webster, who hits front iron. <strong>73-69, 9:37</strong>.</li>
<li><span style="color: #f40000;"><strong>Defensive Possession Four</strong></span>: Garcia comes up the left side on a slow break with three Blazers trailing. Aldridge is in the paint, shading toward Garcia as May sprints down the middle. Aldridge commits to neither, though Webster is nearby to rotate over, as Garcia draws his eyes right and hits May in the middle. Aldridge slaps down on May, who gets to the free-throw line and makes one. <strong>73-70, 9:31</strong>.</li>
<li><strong>Offensive Possession Six</strong>: Miller subs in for Bayless and brings the ball up. He hits Rudy left wing, who then tries and fails to use an Aldridge screen. He gives a bad pass to Aldridge, who passes back and sets another pick. Rudy bursts towards the rim and misses a floater, back iron, as May decides to wait on the rebound and not to step up and defend. 73-70, 9:09.</li>
<li><span style="color: #f40000;"><strong>Defensive Possession Five</strong></span>: After a Howard foul, the ball is inbounded top key to Evans, with Webster defended. Evans dribbles right, drives left and finishes at the rim with Webster riding his right hip. Both Aldridge and Juwan were taken out of the paint by the offense, but Miller was feet away from stepping in and taking a charge. <strong>73-72, 8:55</strong>.</li>
<li><strong>Offensive Possession Seven</strong>: Rudy and Juwan work a pick on the right wing. Juwan pops out as Rudy takes the ball top key. Rudy passes to Juwan, who posts up May, drives left into the paint and is fouled by Thompson. Juwan makes one of two free throws, scoring Portland&#8217;s first point of the quarter. <strong>74-72, 8:37</strong>.</li>
<li><span style="color: #f40000;"><strong>Defensive Possession Six</strong></span>: Batum subs in for Webster. Evans begins top key with Batum defending. Evans goes left wing, using a pick by Thompson, passes to Thompson and gets the handoff coming back, but Batum fights through the pick. Evans dribbles left, spins back into the paint with Batum perfectly situated between him and the basket. Evans shoots from eight feet away off his right hip, misses left and gets his own offensive rebound with three Blazers in the area. <span style="color: #f40000;"><strong>Defensive Possession Seven</strong></span>: Evans passes out to Thompson on the left free-throw line extended. Thompson drives middle and draws contact from Batum, who had rotated over a hair late. Thompson makes the running hook after the contact, but misses the extra free throw. <strong>74-74, 8:11</strong>.</li>
</ul>
<p>There you have it. Fourteen possessions and a 12-1 run later, the game was tied. Of Portland&#8217;s seven offensive possessions, three were used by Rudy. In all three, Rudy either used a defensive mismatch or a pick on the perimeter to get near the rim. In all three, he shot a variation of a floater. Two were defended, one was ignored by the help defense, all three shots missed. Another possession ended with Aldridge charging into Thompson, a questionable (with a bad camera angle) but not terrible call, while the fifth was Bayless missing a similar shot to Rudy&#8217;s misses, Aldridge grabbing the board and Webster missing an open three. The last possession, Juwan got to the free-throw line.</p>
<p>If we decide that Rudy freeing himself for a floater in or around the paint is a quality offensive possession &#8212; it remains to be seen whether it actually is or not &#8212; then six of the seven offensive sets resulted in good shots, the outlier being Aldridge&#8217;s charge. So, there was not a huge problem on offense other than, with most of the early plays being for him, Rudy being unable to finish at the rim.</p>
<p>The run happened, as it has happened so many times before, because of the defense. If we define a quality defensive possession as one where the shot is well defended, whether or not it goes in or not, only one of the seven Kings sets was well defended, when May hit a Juwan-contested long two. The Blazers allowed two open jumpers, one layup, an and-one after an offensive board and put the Kings on the line after getting beat in transition. The best defensive possession was when Batum stuck Evans and defended an awkward shot in the lane, but the Blazers failed to secure the rebound (Evans got it), so it cannot count as a complete quality defense.</p>
<p>In two of the cases Evans broke down his defender in isolaton &#8212; understandable given his talent &#8212; but the true problems, as shown in the play analysis, were simple defensive recognition and help rotations, whether it was simply failing to step to the side and meet a driver or outright forgetting about and failing to communicate responsibilities. These problems have hounded the Blazers for most of the season, and I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if, in looking back at all the leads the Blazers have nearly or fully lost, they were at the root of most of the evil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ripcityproject.com/2010/03/10/blazers-88-kings-81-re-thoughts-blowing-a-lead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blazers 89, Jazz 93 Re-Thoughts</title>
		<link>http://ripcityproject.com/2010/02/22/blazers-89-jazz-93-re-thoughts/</link>
		<comments>http://ripcityproject.com/2010/02/22/blazers-89-jazz-93-re-thoughts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 09:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Coup</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blazers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blown leads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brandon Roy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carlos boozer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comeback]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deron Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jazz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LaMarcus Aldridge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marcus camby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nic Batum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[portland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utah]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ripcityproject.com/?p=3015</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The appropriate way to start things off after the Blazers blow a 25-point lead to the Utah Jazz: with the fans. So, what hurt the most? @DigitalDaggers: #1 Jumpshot after Jumpshot after Jumpshot #2 Nate not coaching the team out of #1. @mitchwinn: only 10 points in the 4th quarter. they had 10 points in [...]</p><p><a href="http://ripcityproject.com/2010/02/22/blazers-89-jazz-93-re-thoughts/">Blazers 89, Jazz 93 Re-Thoughts</a> - <a href="http://ripcityproject.com">Rip City Project</a> - <a href="http://ripcityproject.com">Rip City Project - A Portland Trailblazers Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and More</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The appropriate way to start things off after the Blazers blow a 25-point lead to the Utah Jazz: with the fans. So, what hurt the most?</p>
<p><strong>@DigitalDaggers</strong>: #1 Jumpshot after Jumpshot after Jumpshot #2 Nate not coaching the team out of #1.</p>
<p><strong>@mitchwinn</strong>: only 10 points in the 4th quarter. they had 10 points in the ot.</p>
<p><strong>@SKSevenSwans</strong>: watching the lead slowly but surely decrease. Like Chinese water torture.</p>
<p><strong>@Ell_21</strong>: dre being absolutely horrific down the stretch.</p>
<p><strong>@_BlazerNation_</strong>: The fact that we only scored 24 pts in the 3rd, 4th AND OT hurts me the most. Smh.</p>
<p><strong>@Seth_Johnston</strong>: FESEEEEEEENNNNKOOOOOOOO! (you can quote me on that).</p>
<p>This was the type of game that makes it exceedingly easy to bring out the doom and gloom, but, to the credit of most of the folks we were in contact with on Twitter, there was less of that and more reactions based on realistic expectations.</p>
<p>In many ways, the Blazers were due to blow a massive lead like this. Things like that happen to most teams over the course of the season &#8212; though not always at home to a division rival &#8212; and Portland had allowed a ton of near comebacks in fourth quarters after gaining double-digit leads. Until now, they tended to make a final push to earn the win, however ugly some of them turned out to be. But it happened enough times that we had the data to construct a solid model of the team: offensively efficient enough to go up big, defensively deficient enough not to stay up.</p>
<p><strong>Marcus Camby</strong> was supposed to fix that, sure, but not against the Jazz, though he did try with 18 boards and four blocks. The Jazz aren&#8217;t the worst matchup in the league for Portland just because they have guys that can penetrate and score at the rim, the type of guys a weakside defender like Camby can help neutralize. The Jazz are Portland&#8217;s worst nightmare because they are big, bruising and physical, and above all that they pass better than anyone. The fact that Camby was brought in to plug the defensive holes doesn&#8217;t make Utah any better of a matchup for his lengthy frame, either.</p>
<p>A few folks lamented the volume of jumpshots which led to the Blazers getting outscored 44-19 over the final 19 minutes, including overtime, and they had every reason to. The Blazers opened the fourth quarter with five consecutive misses from the perimeter. After a <strong>Brandon Roy</strong> bailout three to begin overtime, they missed another five consecutive jumpers. They scored 30 points in the paint and allowed 50 on top of 16 offensive rebounds. Those are numbers that aren&#8217;t going to take you deep into the playoffs.</p>
<p>But they are numbers that the Blazers have won consistently with, too. They lost the lead with jumpers, but they got it with them, too, hitting eight consecutive perimeter field-goals mixed in with free throws between the first and second quarters to go ahead 17, and the finished the half with another three with range. With a Jazz defense that collapses the paint and runs off your shooters as well as any team once they start firing their jets and electrons, the Blazers still worked their sets, albeit deeper and deeper into the shot clock, and earned some decent looks. A <strong>Nic Batum</strong> three here, any one of four misses in the final minute fall there, and this is a win. The simplicity of the following statement may read like an excuse, but offensively the Blazers hit a defensively-encouraged rut, and on defense they were just as outmatched as they have been since the two big bodies fell their season&#8217;s final fall.</p>
<p>It hurts to see the Blazers clinging to a one-game lead in eighth place in the Western Conference, but the loss doesn&#8217;t speak to how they will fare in that battle. The Jazz bring to light the limitations of an Oden-less rotation, but they hardly prescribe any big changes to the system, nor do they urge on the lamentations over focus, toughness, determination and the other buzzwords. These are the 2010 Blazers, and they will fare better against most other teams doing the exact same things, good and bad, they did today.</p>
<p><em><strong>Individual Thoughts</strong></em>:</p>
<p><strong>LaMarcus Aldridge</strong> had another first half worth of thousands of heads silently nodding in approval. He fought for position, he used counter moves in the post, he made and used contact and was the focal point of Portland&#8217;s offense during their extended run. The 10 rebounds were great, but he had nine of those midway through the third quarter, when a flurry of fouls moved him to the bench. By the time he returned, the Blazers were scrambling for any offense by that point and they never settled down enough to re-establish LMA down low. He couldn&#8217;t do much against the <strong>Deron Williams</strong>-<strong>Carlos Boozer </strong>combo in the second half, but it&#8217;s worth noting that seven of Boozer&#8217;s 16 rebounds after halftime came with LaMarcus on the bench.</p>
<p>For most of the game it looked like another one of those &#8220;Who is that? It can&#8217;t be Roy. Roy is better than that&#8221; nights. But after Portland&#8217;s offense sunk into some cold crevice of the Atlantic Ocean, Roy went on a bit of a run, scoring nine points after the 6:38 mark in the fourth, getting to the line eight times over the next four minutes while only making four. You can probably attribute some of those misses to his leg(s), but it just looked like Portland needed Roy to create too much against a defense that makes it very difficult to get anywhere. A good test for him personally, and perhaps a confidence booster in that hammy, but the package wasn&#8217;t there to pull Portland out of the hole.</p>
<p>As mentioned, Camby did everything he could on defense and on the boards while offering a 1-of-7 from the field. It&#8217;s a credit to him that even after Utah started boxing him out with two bodies, he was still close to every loose ball, but he&#8217;s not the type to bully his way through people. As good of a help defender as he is &#8212; and boy does he take some mean swipes at shots &#8212; he&#8217;s still of the long, athletic mold, which isn&#8217;t all that different from Aldridge in terms of one-on-one defense.</p>
<p><strong>Nic Batum</strong> was a lightning rod in the first half, scoring 14 points on an array of jumpers and easy buckets. But he didn&#8217;t get back into the game until there was a minute left in the third, and by that time the rhythm had left him. For the rest of the night he drew the duty of keeping Williams out of he paint, which he did with some mild success, certainly more than anyone else did. You would like to see him get into the second-half rotation earlier, especially when <strong>Martell Webster</strong> is having a non-appearance, and be more involved in the offense, but you also have to point out that Utah didn&#8217;t give him much space after the early jumpers.</p>
<p>Webster was hardly noticeable, which is strange because of his usual high level of performance against the Jazz. It&#8217;s a shame, but before you go jumping on the &#8220;Start Nic&#8221; bandwagon, think about what you want from each player. Webster has admittedly been pretty bad whenever he tries to create on offense. Batum has shown some promise in that area. It&#8217;s possible Batum has more room for offensive growth, and he&#8217;s more likely to use some of those expanded tools in the second unit.</p>
<p><strong>Andre Miller</strong> did a fine job keeping the ball in circulation in the first half, but he was just as at fault as anyone when things went sour with a bit of a quick trigger from the perimeter &#8212; 5-of-18 overall.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m officially nominating <strong>Rudy Fernandez</strong> for the Most Polarizing Blazer role now that Steve Blake and Travis Outlaw are out of town. His energy in the passing lanes and in transition is infectious to the rest of the team. He changes the game when he gets out and runs, as well as when he makes hard cuts to the rim. But when the defense swarms him and there&#8217;s no space coming off the picks, he isn&#8217;t really going anywhere and can waste valuable time doing just that. He wants to create, the Blazers need him to create, but as exciting as some sections of his work can be, the painting as a whole still winds up being a bit of a mess, despite the complete lack of turnovers.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve mentioned how bad a matchup Utah is, haven&#8217;t we? Well the Jazz are Godzilla, and <strong>Juwan Howard</strong> is Japan. That should tell you how his night went. <strong>Dante Cunningham</strong> didn&#8217;t fare much better outside of some nice jumpers.</p>
<p>And finally <strong>Jerryd Bayless</strong>. I&#8217;m sure there will be some hate for him tomorrow after nine ineffective minutes when the Blazers desperately needed him. One thing to remember is that in the last couple weeks, and especially now that Blake is gone, he is essentially playing a new position at point guard than even earlier in the year, when the call was to supply as much self-induced offense as possible. And in that new position where he has to be a new sort of player, that new player has hit a rookie wall. As such, we are in standby mode with Bayless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ripcityproject.com/2010/02/22/blazers-89-jazz-93-re-thoughts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Database Caching 21/29 queries in 0.165 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 502/557 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.fansided.com

 Served from: ripcityproject.com @ 2013-05-23 11:23:57 by W3 Total Cache -->